I’d think a proper hunger games blog is due, now that I’ve read the trilogy in a week over Easter and been to see the film… twice. So here are my thoughts & some favourite youtube clips based on the hunger games.
THE CAPITOL
So the capitol seem like a twisted people. To punish the districts for the past uprising, each year they make two children from each district fight to the death in an arena.
The Capitol make the hunger games a big event and force the 12 districts to celebrate it and enjoy watching it. Twisted? Probably, but dear blog reader, you are probably just as bad as the capitol if you’ve seen the film. Most people who have seen the film knew what it was about before watching it, yet chose to watch it anyway. Heck, I’ve seen it twice. We become like the capitol because we enjoy the entertainment, even if it is watching 12-18 year olds kill each other in the arena.
BEANIE BABY HUNGER GAMES
So secondly, I wanted to share this video. It’s made using beanie baby toys and is probably more accurate to the book than the film itself. It summarises the hunger games in 11minutes. Worth the watch!
THE BOOK V FILM BATTLE
So there’s always a debate about whether the film is better than the book or not. I think it’s a stupid debate. It shouldn’t be either/or, because if you read the book, the storyline isn’t new when watching the film: you can’t get the full ‘wow’ film experience. The same applies if you watch the film first, the book might not be as good afterwards because you know what happens from watching the film; there’s less suspense. I read the books first, and thought the film did a good job in complementing the books.
The film did a great job is portraying the tracker jackers, Rue’s death and the difference between the capitol and the districts. I think reading the books first made the film more dramatic, because every time a character is introduced, you already know what is going to happen to them. For example, characters you have been made to like in this first film do indeed die in the second and third books. Sad times.
I know a lot of people moan about film adaptations because they don’t always stick to the plot, but the Hunger Games did a decent job. Lots of smaller storylines were left out, but that had to be done, otherwise the film would’ve been an extra hour long. For example, the dog creatures at the end are called mutts/mutations in the books, and they have the eyes of the tributes that have died in the arena. There’s a great storyline about Avoxes, people who have disobeyed the capitol and had their tongues cut out, but you have to read the book to learn more about that. Haymitch is even more of a drunk in the books; he falls off the stage at the district 12 reaping. 
If you like gore then the book is probably better because the film has been cleaned up to make it suitable for a 12A rating. E.g. Peeta gets blood poisoning and the wound on Katniss’s head is meant to be really really bad. But hey, the lack of blood isn’t necessary for the film to be good.
FUTURE FILMS
There are going to be more films!! Yaaay! I’m rather excited as you can tell. The second and third books introduce more intriguing characters and kill off many people too. And the arena in the second book… PHWOARRR! Can’t wait to see that on the cinema screen!
In the second book, we find out how Haymitch won the 50th hunger games. Some geniuses on youtube have made an awesome 12 minute video to show his hunger games. It’s quite gory, but makes me uber excited for the next film. I don’t know how much the next film will touch on Haymitch’s hunger games, but it’s safe to watch this clip if you haven’t read the books. It doesn’t contain spoilers of the main plot. Enjoy!






















